NOTRAILalliance

Home Eminent Domain Encroachment Farms & Ranches County Landmarks Ecosystem Fire We Are All Affected Contact Us Calendar

EMINENT DOMAIN

Boulder County Comprehensive Plan:  Section OS 6.03

The County shall acquire trail rights-of-way through purchase, lease, donation or dedication from any public or private entity.

Boulder County Comprehensive Plan:  Section OS 1.03

The power of eminent domain shall be used only in exceptional cases, when obviously necessary to protect the public interest.

DON'T TREAD ON ME

Eminent domain is the power and process whereby governments and certain agencies claim private property from an unwilling seller.  It has historically been used for projects such as roads, schools or utilities.  Recent cases have increased public concern over what many believe is misuse of this power.  A backlash of public opinion against judges and municipal leaders has arisen from these cases.  However some municipal leaders have been encouraged by these cases and have tried to use eminent domain power more aggressively.  Some say low municipal coffers are preventing more eminent domain land grabs; once public coffers refill and municipalities can afford more projects, misuse of eminent domain could increase. 

Some believe eminent domain should not be wielded at all.  Others believe its use in limited cases should be a tool for a prudent government.  However some uses lead many to fear that where municipalities fail to plan, private landowners may pay the price.

Boulder County failed to plan for a regional trail in this valley.  The Lyons to Boulder trail has been in the Comprehensive Plan for thirty years.  However in all that time, while they used our tax dollars to purchase 68,000 acres of Open Space, one in seven acres in this County, they failed to fulfill their promise to trail enthusiasts to put a trail in this valley by failing to purchase the land here for that trail.  Now they want private landowners, or the canal operator, to bear the burden of this trail. 

Boulder County does not own the Boulder Feeder Canal.  This land is owned by a public corporation.  A trail along the canal would not use the current maintenance road on the east side of the canal.  That would interfere with maintenance of the canal.  A brand new trail would need to be built on the opposite (west) side of the canal.  This would require use of property not owned by the corporation in many segments of the trail and for a variety of reasons:

The corporation does not own all of the land along the canal.  The canal crosses private property and a trail along the canal would cross over those sections of private property.  Some sections of the canal are extremely dangerous and those would have to be avoided, requiring diversion to nearby private property.  Don't be misled by current fences, as many do not accurately reflect property lines; in some places corporate land is too thin and planners have indicated that private property would be needed to widen the trail.

Boulder County has never used eminent domain for a recreational trail.  However this project is different in that this will be the first time they have attempted to build a trail of this length in large part on property they do not own.  County planners and County Commissioners have confirmed that eminent domain is a possibility for this trail. 

Boulder County's Frequently Asked Questions states: "The use of eminent domain is always a last resort".  This is common language before eventual use of eminent domain.  See the Eminent Domain Abuse Survival Guide PDF page 8: “...eminent domain will only be used as a last resort.”--That just means that if the residents or businesses don’t agree to sell, eminent domain will be used.”  On a trail conflict in Minnesota, reporter Cole Mathisen quotes similar language: “Eminent domain is a last resort we’ve always taken that position, but we’re at our last resort”.

Even if eminent domain is used on only a few landowners in this valley, just one successful abuse of eminent domain power would set a precedent and the property rights of all Boulder County landowners would be weakened.  Don't let the laying of regional trails on private property become Boulder County trail building policy.  Boulder County has many more trails to build.  Your land could be next.

Continued on Encroachment   <------Click here

A history of the eminent domain process written by the League of Women Voters is linked below.  Wikipedia's Kelo vs. City of New London (2005) explains the U.S. Supreme Court case which caused national debate The Telluride Colorado case discussed by Peoples Press Collective brings eminent domain close to home, and the Left Hand Valley Courier reports that Boulder County Open Space is planning the Dry Creek Trail in Niwot over some private land as well.

>JOIN US<

Further Reading -- Click on the Titles Below:

Eminent Domain Abuse Survival Guide:  Grassroots Strategies for Winning the Fight Against Eminent Domain Abuse

KIMT-com, Cole Mathisen:  Trail of Controversy Leads to Eminent Domain

League of Women Voters of Jefferson County:  EMM Material on Eminent Domain

Wikipedia:  Kelo vs. City of New London

Peoples Press Collective:  Additional Eminent Domain Abuse - will the Mullarkey Court back Boulder's Land Grab, too?  

Left Hand Valley Courier, Shari Phiel:  Dry Creek Trail On The Construction Map, March 2009  (2nd article)

Send mail to info@NoTrailAlliance.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 08/29/09